- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 08:23:02 +0200
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Friday, April 2, 2004, 8:16:24 AM, David wrote: >> Blink is not required to be supported for conformance. It strikes me >> that a user agent could have a user preference whether blink is >> honored or not. DW> The problem there is that it breaks the model that preferences can DW> be mapped into a virtual user style sheet. Yes, I understood the orthogonality argument. I was just suggesting a work around for this specific accessibility requirement, without breaking conformance. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Friday, 2 April 2004 01:23:38 UTC