- From: Claire Jennings (Siemens Business Services Inc) <a-cljenn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:02:41 -0700
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Dave Shea" <dave@mezzoblue.com>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
This is true, but the cost is still 100K for the first page then 5k for each page after that. In addition to this, it is the first page that generally should be the most performance minded of the pages. Claire -----Original Message----- From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ian Hickson Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 11:25 AM To: Dave Shea Cc: www-style@w3.org Subject: RE: CSS3 Genrated content, comments/questions On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Dave Shea wrote: > > As we rely on the style sheet more, the file size goes up dramatically. > I'm frequently writing 15 to 25k .css files, and that's just for screen > media. I know we're making progress when it comes to seperation of > content and presentation (and I understand why that's important), but > I'm concerned about the ever-increasing plain-text files I have to > generate. But due to stylesheets being site-wide, and due to the maturity of caching solutions, this stylesheet only has to be downloaded once. So what used to be 100k per page is now 100k per site, with just 5k per page. So the overall experience is much, much faster and significantly lower in overall bandwidth cost. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL U+1047E /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 15 September 2003 15:01:59 UTC