- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:03:42 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Stanimir Stamenkov <stanio@myrealbox.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
>
> Maybe a better syntax would be:
>
> dt::before
>
> or even
>
> dt::outside {
> /* specify that the ::before or ::outside would group the DT and
> * some elements after, in some way (using some syntax) */
> }
>
> I'm still maiking myself familiar with the spec and I'm not sure if
> this approach is even "interesting"... ?
It's a possibility, it depends on exactly what the syntax would be.
I'm not sure that we really want to have ::outside overloaded like that
though. ::outside and ::before are currently well defined.
--
Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL
U+1047E /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 31 October 2003 07:03:56 UTC