- From: Scott Romack <sromack@PTSTEAMS.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:39:26 -0600
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <C902C0F80A54A143AEEAB9893B758DB001C49B@RICHARDSONSRV.PTSTEAMS.COM>
> I note that you carefully avoided answering my question... I appreciate that. Well I tried to, the example http://lucen8.com/border-box.htm <http://lucen8.com/border-box.htm> was given as an example (in opera) but I'm no as prolific as Tantek "Since negative content widths are illegal, it makes sense for the computed content width to be set to 0 in this case." Thanks all for helping me understand some of the complexities involved although I'm still not convinced. From a visual design perspective it would be nice to be able to specify that a box be 200 units and have it actually be 200 units. I really don't care what happens if you do something stupid like "width: 10px; padding: 5px; border: 6px" or nested divs with padding. I do understand the specification would have to consider these errors. Again, please leave border-box in the CSS3 spec. Shaggy -- "Creativity is more important than knowledge." -- Einstein
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2003 11:39:25 UTC