- From: Scott Romack <sromack@PTSTEAMS.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 13:22:43 -0600
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <C902C0F80A54A143AEEAB9893B758DB001C499@RICHARDSONSRV.PTSTEAMS.COM>
You are correct, Thanks, I was looking at opera in non Strict mode. My comment stems in fact from the CSS3 document http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-box-20021024/#box-sizing "The property 'box-sizing' was first proposed to provide an upgrade path for certain browsers that interpreted 'width' <http://www.w3c.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-box-20021024/#width> the wrong way. 'Box-width' <http://www.w3c.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-box-20021024/#box-width> and 'box-height' <http://www.w3c.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-box-20021024/#box-height> are proposed as improved versions of 'box-sizing' <http://www.w3c.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-box-20021024/#box-sizing> . However, newer versions of those browsers have already fixed the bug and it is not clear that these properties are really needed anymore." I misread "these properties are not needed" as refering to the box-sizing not the box-width and box-height, sorry. My statement is simple I don't like the content-box model! could someone persuade me otherwise? I just don't understand why if I say; div {width:200px;padding:7px;border:2px} that width dosn't mean 200px. Thanks again, shaggy www.lucen8.com
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2003 14:20:20 UTC