- From: Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 05:55:33 -0800
- To: "'Bjoern Hoehrmann'" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] > Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 5:43 AM > To: Robert Koberg > Cc: www-style@w3.org > > * Robert Koberg wrote: > >> On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Robert Koberg wrote: > >> > > >> > I see that you (Tantek) are not necessarily dissing XSL, but I wanted > to > >> > point out that XSL is not useless. > >> > >> Please don't confuse XSL with XSLT. > > > >The acronym 'XSL' is generally used to describe both. > > No, it is generally used to describe either Formatting Objects or > Transformations, that's why the term is not generally used, you > rather refer to XSLT or XSL-FO to avoid confusion. Well, I understood Ian to be referring to XSL *as* XSL-FO, which is why I mentioned (or attempted) that XSL is an inclusive thing, not one or the other. However, what you wrote is more clear. Best, -Rob
Received on Sunday, 26 October 2003 08:55:36 UTC