- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:00:30 -0500
- To: staffan.mahlen@comhem.se
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
staffan.mahlen@comhem.se wrote: > I agree that this theory works with trivial markup and for simple > cases. Most markup is trivial. The idea should be to make the easy things (simple document layout) easy, and the hard things (complex layout) possible. Currently, that is the case. Making hard things easier at the expence of requiring all simple document to include gobs of CSS to handle margins seems counterproductive... > I also think the feature may be to simplistic as it works. If your > example had a background color on section, the margin of the children > para should probably not have been collapsed. Why not? The text will have the proper background, as desired. If the intent is that the section should have a strip of background around its contents, padding on the section should be used. If there is no such intent, then why should the margin not collapse? -Boris
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2003 14:13:26 UTC