- From: <staffan.mahlen@comhem.se>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 18:37:09 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 13 Oct 2003 at 15:03, Ian Hickson wrote: > I believe the spec does say this. Oh perhaps it does. It seems i was trying to figure this out the wrong way around with false assumptions on what the block formatting contexts meant. Since floats are covered, items with non-initial overflow does not need any explanation, table-cells are covered (by UA specific...) i suppose the only issue might be inline-block:s. That is a very minor issue if it isen't covered already by virtue of being shrink-wrapped, eg cell-like. The adjacent bit was a part of my confused idea of what a block formatting context was, and made me think they should always be cleared rather than pseudo-floated. Thanks for filling me in, /Staffan
Received on Monday, 13 October 2003 12:37:35 UTC