- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 09:31:25 +0100
- To: Dris <dris86@cox.net>
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-style@w3.org
On Saturday, November 22, 2003, 6:32:45 AM, Dris wrote: D> I see the point, thanks for pointing that out. Then again, I think D> accidentally sending a private message to a list is a little far D> fetched, No, its happened, more than once, including to me. D> considering the reply would be to a list message (that, and D> I've previously expected my replies to go there). Anyways, I'm D> satisfied with that response (and I never could figure out a practical D> use for "Reply All"... now I know). D> On Nov 21, 2003, at 8:40 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >> * Dris wrote: >>> This is off topic, but I'd like to know why the list doesn't use >>> Reply-to in the headers. I've seen it in countless other lists. With >>> Reply-to, replying to someone's message will automatically put >>> www-style into the TO: field. Several times I've accidentally sent >>> messages to other users in the list instead of the list itself. A >>> little frustrating. Would this be possible to add to the www-style >>> message list? >> >> http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Reply-To%3A+munging%22 D> ________ D> "Irony is a voluntary survey with required fields." D> ~ Dris ~ -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 22 November 2003 03:31:52 UTC