- From: Dris <dris86@cox.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 23:32:45 -0600
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
I see the point, thanks for pointing that out. Then again, I think accidentally sending a private message to a list is a little far fetched, considering the reply would be to a list message (that, and I've previously expected my replies to go there). Anyways, I'm satisfied with that response (and I never could figure out a practical use for "Reply All"... now I know). On Nov 21, 2003, at 8:40 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Dris wrote: >> This is off topic, but I'd like to know why the list doesn't use >> Reply-to in the headers. I've seen it in countless other lists. With >> Reply-to, replying to someone's message will automatically put >> www-style into the TO: field. Several times I've accidentally sent >> messages to other users in the list instead of the list itself. A >> little frustrating. Would this be possible to add to the www-style >> message list? > > http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Reply-To%3A+munging%22 ________ "Irony is a voluntary survey with required fields." ~ Dris ~
Received on Saturday, 22 November 2003 00:32:52 UTC