Re: css21 replaced, non-replaced

aha or oops. I see that a reference or 2 in chapter 10 is linked in css21. The
first refs are in chapter 9 and so should be linked, as should the remainder in
10 for consistency. Although the link for "inline replaced elements" describes
the calculations for width, it doesn't define what they are. 

(I had found the problem in css2 and then checked ch 9 and saw there were also
no links there when I reported the problem.
So I didnt notice the link in ch 10 until after I sent the initial mail.)

Tex Texin wrote:
> Suggestion-
> I think it is a true statement for both css2 and css21, that the terminology
> "replaced" and "non-replaced" are not really introduced in CSS. They are just
> used without definition or introduction. Checking the index, the definition is
> provided by the glossary but the index doesn't list its usage in the document.
> The way I came to this trivia, is that I was reading the visual formatting
> model and trying to find the definition.
> It is a key term to the model and I was surprised that the term wasn't
> hyperlinked.
> So consider introducing the terms/concepts, or at least linking the term to its
> glossary definition.
> If I am wrong and the terms are introduced, then change this to a suggestion to
> index the intro.
> tex

Tex Texin   cell: +1 781 789 1898
Xen Master                
Making e-Business Work Around the World

Received on Saturday, 15 November 2003 01:13:04 UTC