- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 14:41:20 -0500
- To: Herr Christian Wolfgang Hujer <Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com>
- CC: www-style Mailing List <www-style@w3.org>
Herr Christian Wolfgang Hujer wrote: > I think XPath is fast enough. > Experience: Use of large XPath expressions (>250) making extensive use of the > document() function several times (>10) in each single xslt transformation of > websites (pages >250) using Ant, Xalan, Xerces and Java. And the times involved were? It's hard to work with blanket statements unsupported by hard data. > If the implementation of XPath in a UA would be only half as fast as that of > Xalan (which isn't know for speed anyway), instant response for any web page > <200kB is guaranteed I think. "Instant" means "under 5 msec" in the use cases we're talking about here.... because the UA is being given 10 msec to reresolve style and reflow/repaint/whatever as necessary. Not saying it's not doable, I just have no data to work with, since my XPath experience is severely limited. -Boris
Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 15:41:24 UTC