- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:38:54 +0200
- To: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn.ulsberg@nrk.no>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote: > Robin Berjon wrote: >>Or you could have XPath functions. > > What kind of functions are you thinking about? The existing XPath > functions like string() and such, or functions in CSS to embed > XPath, like the "select()" i use as an example? XPath functions. Nothing keeps one from adding some. css:first-line(/foo//bar). >>But why bother? > > Because I think XPath has better syntax and is better fitted for > the pure task of selecting nodes than the existing CSS selectors. > But this is not to be misunderstood with that I don't like the > CSS selectors, because I do. Really. I just don't think they're > optimal for the task. That judgement seems very subjective to me :) >>XHTML and SVG however, are much more likely to require >>frequent reevaluation. > > And what selector language would be preferred in conjunction with > SVG, for instance? Depends on the situation but that's precisely the question that brought me into this debate (which I've otherwise tired of ages ago). I would like to take the time to work through a one to one comparison between CSS and XPath. Hopefully this week-end if I get the time. -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr> Research Engineer, Expway http://expway.fr/ 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 04:39:03 UTC