- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:43:34 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org, www-style-request@w3.org, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: (wrong string) ørn Ulsberg <asbjorn.ulsberg@nrk.no>
On Wednesday, June 18, 2003, 10:07:59 PM, Ian wrote: IH> On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Chris Lilley wrote: >> >> What I wonder though is whether you - or anyone on this list - has >> made a more detailed evaluation and comparison of Xpath and of CSS >> Selectors I terms of power, implementation efficiency, and problems >> that would occur in dynamic as opposed to static usage. IH> I'm not aware of such a comparison. IH> Sadly, even if there was one, I'm not sure it would make much difference. IH> The choice of whether to use CSS or XPath seems to be more based on IH> political allegiance than technical merit. :-) Well, as I alluded, my interest was not so much in what to use for CSS3, which is already clear, but for use of XPath in other dynamic reevaluation contexts. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2003 16:44:02 UTC