- From: Matt <matt@hogwarts-library.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 14:57:57 +0100
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
- Cc: "Ben Godfrey" <afternoon@uk2.net>
Ben Godfrey wrote: >> I agree, this is something we should add to CSS, because it is >> presentational. Here are some suggested requirements: > > Is it? What about alt or title values? The only presentational part > is connecting the content (the links) with the images. Even this isn't just presentational. Think of a true image map (a map of countries) - it's not just a presentational feature that means clicking on Sweden takes you to the swedish page, that's structural. > Apart from > that it's content because it's not something that can be dropped if > the CSS is missing. If done properly then with missing CSS there could just be a list of links remaining. So long as the image is loaded from the CSS and all implications that there is an image to click on are not in the HTML. > Coming up with some way to use CSS as the connection might be valid, > but I think it will be hard to make the syntax simpler than HTML. Me too. The syntax isn't that bad in HTML really anyway. Matt
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2003 09:57:08 UTC