- From: John Lewis <lewi0371@mrs.umn.edu>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 23:47:23 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
Ernest wrote on Tuesday, June 3, 2003 at 9:04:47 PM: > John Lewis wrote: >> Ernest wrote on Tuesday, June 3, 2003 at 7:06:54 PM: >>> I presume that the intention is to provide a mechanism whereby it >>> is easy to determine which row and column a cell belongs to. >>> However, how does the use of :hover to do this achieve this when >>> the page is printed and interactive pseudo-classes such as :hover >>> are not available? >> >> It doesn't. Nor does it do so for links or any other type of element. > Which was my point, I was asking a rhetorical question there. Sorry, I should have noticed that. I still don't get what you're implying about his example. > I'll grant that given how :hover has tended to be implemented, it > may be necessary to use some other pseudo-class to achieve the > needed capability to address only interactive elements. I agree. Trying to retrofit :hover for that purpose will cause headaches for authors. With a new pseudo-class for interactive elements, there is no legacy behavior to contend with, and :hover can be used as a more generic pseudo-class. There are definitely two different desired behaviors, so two pseudo-classes make perfect sense. -- John Lewis
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2003 00:47:52 UTC