- From: Matthew Fletcher <fletcherm@business1st.uk.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:04:22 +0100
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
Yes, sorry guys, I realised that constant would be a more appropriate term as soon as I sent the original message. Matt Fletcher -----Original Message----- From: Ben Godfrey [mailto:afternoon@uk2.net] Sent: 29 May 2003 20:51 To: www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: Font definition Definitely. There would be no need to change the values, so variable is just a bad choice of word on my part. Ben On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 19:10 Europe/London, Matt wrote: > > Ben Godfrey wrote: >>> What about every other value? Wouldn't it be great to be able to >>> declare "variables" at the top of a stylesheet and reference them >>> where needed. Color schemes are the example that spring to mind. >> >> This would be a powerful way to modularise complicated stylesheets. >> One could set variables and import a set of styles to make use of >> those variables, similar to the way that XSL is sometimes >> modularised. >> >> This can be done at the moment with the approach of assigning >> selectors to properties rather than vice versa mentioned >> previously, but providing variables would increase the separation >> and maintainability of the individual files. This could be very >> useful in environments with large disparate sites and teams. > > Wouldn't it be better to use contants instead of variables? Perhaps an > @-rule: > > @constants { > %mycolour%: #ffc; > %myothercolor%: #cce; > %mylength: 2em; > } > > p { > color: %mycolor%; > margin-top: %my-length%; > } > etc. > > Matt > > (q) Ben Godfrey? (a) Web Developer and Designer See http://aftnn.org/ for details
Received on Monday, 2 June 2003 04:05:51 UTC