- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 09:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Afternoon <afternoon@uk2.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Afternoon wrote: > > If this is a concern for the WG, why not pack up now and come back in > 2005? Other browsers will happen and they will be relevant, other > innovations will occur in CSS and they will be more relevant. This is > maybe a reason not to change CSS , but it's not a reason to block this > particular addition. It's not a reason to block an addition that can't yet be done, but it is a reason to add an addition that _can_ be done. In the former case, authors will use the feature to the detriment of legacy browsers. In the latter case, given the two options (work in all browsers, work just in the new browsers) they'll use the backwards-compatible option. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL "meow" /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 4 July 2003 12:44:06 UTC