- From: Michael Day <mikeday@yeslogic.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 02:52:10 -0500 (EST)
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
> > ::nth-last-page(expr) > > This is not easy to implement. It inhibits incremental rendering, > and, in fact, I think, requires iterative pagination, as the rendering > of the element may change the number of pages. That is true. The same criticism would seem to apply to ::last-page also, although perhaps not as severely. Any comments on ::first-page and nth-page? Michael
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2003 08:39:48 UTC