- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:55:23 -0800 (PST)
- To: "Peter Foti (PeterF)" <PeterF@SystolicNetworks.com>
- Cc: "'www-style@w3.org'" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Peter Foti (PeterF) wrote: > > I haven't been following this thread, but I can think of 1 benefit of an CSS > as XML... XML User Agents would only need a single parser, vs. having both > an XML parser and a CSS parser. This isn't true. They'd still need an HTTP parser, a URI parser, a CSS value parser, a JavaScript parser, a PNG parser, etc. In any case, the parser is by _far_ the _easiest_ part of CSS to implement, so this isn't really an advantage. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL "meow" /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2003 15:55:08 UTC