- From: Toby A Inkster <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 01:29:16 -0500 (EST)
- To: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org, www-html-editor@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
Received on Friday, 4 April 2003 04:25:34 UTC
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:52:14AM -0500, Ernest Cline wrote: | If there | were no earlier (X)HTML standards, I think that separator model would | be clearly the superior. If XHTML2 was not already engaged in the | pruning of existing (X)HTML elements, then markup elements would | clearly be the preferred choice. However, the earlier standards do | exist and XHTML2 is pruning a significant number of (X)HTML elements, | meaning that the choice must be made on another basis. An argument against it is this. Your &ls; entity would be effectively and semantically the same as <br/> which is one of the elements we're actively tring to get rid of! -- Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS | mailto:tobyink@goddamn.co.uk | pgp:0x6A2A7D39 aim:inka80 | icq:6622880 | yahoo:tobyink | jabber:tobyink@a-message.de http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/ | "You've got spam!" playing://(nothing)
Received on Friday, 4 April 2003 04:25:34 UTC