- From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 13:48:11 -0800
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/7/02 12:29 PM, "Kevin Smith" <k.smith@tatnet.com> wrote: > > On 11/6/02 7:13 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > >> This change is already in the CSS2 errata: >> http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/REC-CSS2-19980512-errata.html#x54 > > I've often wondered why there's no link to the errata from the affected text > in the spec. Is there some philosophical reason to /not/ do so? Um, because if you were updating the affected text in the spec itself (which marking it up with hyperlinks would be), then you might as well just fix text itself. Which is what the CSS working group is doing[1]. Thanks, Tantek [1] http://w3.org/TR/CSS21
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2002 16:35:19 UTC