- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 17:49:06 +0100
- To: ewexler@stickdog.com
- CC: www-style@w3.org
ewexler@stickdog.com wrote: > Ian Hickson responded to Sigurd Lerstad: >> The <html> element is the only child of the infinite canvas. It is whatever box >> it is set to using the 'display' property (and hopefully in CSS2, the 'position' >> and 'float' properties). (Sorry, typo, I meant CSS3.) > So we must resolve the conflict about initial containing blocks between CSS2:9.1.2 and > CSS2:10.1. I believe the intent of the authers was that the initial containing block be the root element, and the root element is contained by a UA-defined containing block, although that should indeed be cleared up. -- Ian Hickson ``The inability of a user agent to implement part of this specification due to the limitations of a particular device (e.g., non interactive user agents will probably not implement dynamic pseudo-classes because they make no sense without interactivity) does not imply non-conformance.'' -- Selectors, Sec13
Received on Sunday, 5 May 2002 12:49:16 UTC