- From: Peter Foti (PeterF) <PeterF@SystolicNetworks.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:37:58 -0500
- To: "'www-style@w3.org'" <www-style@w3.org>
Christian,
I don't know where you are seeing "your browser is not standards
compliant". I just tried visiting their website with Nutscrape 4, and I
did not see any such message (and if ever there was a non-compliant
browser, Netscape 4 is it)! It was my understanding that Microsoft put
this on their site and then almost immediately took it off. I couldn't
seem to find it, but I'm sure it's possible that it's still on there
somewhere.
Regards,
Peter Foti
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Christian Wolfgang Hujer
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:47 AM
> To: Hoyt, Phil; 'Jesse McCarthy'; www-style@w3.org
> Subject: Re: conformance (was layout solutions blah blah blah)
>
>
> Am Montag, 28. Januar 2002 16:23 schrieb Hoyt, Phil:
> > In defence of the Browser makers: Jesse, reporting bugs
> admirable and
> > useful, but I think you would do well to keep your broad
> judgements on the
> > quality of software and software companies off this list. It is
> > counterproductive in that it doesn't point out any fact that was not
> > already known and only serves to offend and anger people
> without whom you
> > might not have a browser at all. Microsoft deserves credit
> for providing a
> > browser that (still) provides among the best css support out there.
>
> I would agree with you, if Microsoft would not offend us,
> a) the users, that try to visit MS pages with non-MS
> browsers, ("your browser
> is not standards compliant" - but MS, so is yours?)
> b) the vendors of other browsers, (by the same thing stated above)
>
> But since MS behave contrary, Jesse's got me full on his/her side.
>
>
> Greetings
>
> Christian
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2002 11:36:55 UTC