- From: Peter Foti (PeterF) <PeterF@SystolicNetworks.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:37:58 -0500
- To: "'www-style@w3.org'" <www-style@w3.org>
Christian, I don't know where you are seeing "your browser is not standards compliant". I just tried visiting their website with Nutscrape 4, and I did not see any such message (and if ever there was a non-compliant browser, Netscape 4 is it)! It was my understanding that Microsoft put this on their site and then almost immediately took it off. I couldn't seem to find it, but I'm sure it's possible that it's still on there somewhere. Regards, Peter Foti > -----Original Message----- > From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Christian Wolfgang Hujer > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:47 AM > To: Hoyt, Phil; 'Jesse McCarthy'; www-style@w3.org > Subject: Re: conformance (was layout solutions blah blah blah) > > > Am Montag, 28. Januar 2002 16:23 schrieb Hoyt, Phil: > > In defence of the Browser makers: Jesse, reporting bugs > admirable and > > useful, but I think you would do well to keep your broad > judgements on the > > quality of software and software companies off this list. It is > > counterproductive in that it doesn't point out any fact that was not > > already known and only serves to offend and anger people > without whom you > > might not have a browser at all. Microsoft deserves credit > for providing a > > browser that (still) provides among the best css support out there. > > I would agree with you, if Microsoft would not offend us, > a) the users, that try to visit MS pages with non-MS > browsers, ("your browser > is not standards compliant" - but MS, so is yours?) > b) the vendors of other browsers, (by the same thing stated above) > > But since MS behave contrary, Jesse's got me full on his/her side. > > > Greetings > > Christian > >
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2002 11:36:55 UTC