- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 01:58:54 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
> From: Jesse McCarthy [SMTP:mccarthy36@earthlink.net] > hack. Of course, the statements quoted need to be evaluated on a case-by- > case or person-by-person basis. I don't develop for non-visual media, so > should I care about this? If you are in the USA, Australia, or Europe, it is rather difficult not to be obliged to support non-visual media. If you are in the USA and your customer is a federal government agency, or you are developing an external web site for a customer that is a supplier to such a body, you are covered by "section 508", which would require that the site be accessible to people with disablities, including blindness <http://www.section508.gov/>. I believe the following applies to the US as well, but certainly appears to apply in the UK and has been the source of successful court action in Australia (Sydney Olympics web site).... If your web site is used in connection with the supply of services to the public, and the nature of the business is not such that it is intrinsically unsuitable for blind users (very few web based businesses would fit this category), you are obliged to make the site accessible to blind users, whether or not there are currently any blind customers of the company running the site. IANAL (For the moderator: unfortunately I take this list in the office but it is now unreasonable for me to post to it from there.)
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 07:04:14 UTC