- From: Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 11:58:57 -0800
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> Subject: Re: Browser support for downloadable fonts in CSS Date: Wed, Feb 6, 2002, 11:38 AM > On Friday, February 01, 2002, 12:43:16 AM, Kynn wrote: > > KB> Anyone got a good reference on which browsers support downloadable > KB> fonts as per the CSS level 2 specification? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I take this to mean "per the CSS level 2 specification", not, "per portions/fractions of the CSS level 2 specification". > The term for such support is WebFonts. The following I am aware of, > additions welcomed: > <lengthy list of (partial) implementations> What is not known is whether any of these implementations actually support WebFonts per the entire WebFonts specification in CSS2. Indeed, it is also not known if any of these implementations are actually interoperable. Perhaps if there was a WebFonts test suite we could check some of these claims of implementation to see how much is actually implemented (hopefully interoperably at that), and how much is only theory in a specification. Tantek
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2002 14:54:17 UTC