- From: Bernd Mielke <bernd_mozilla@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:46:33 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
The discussion process for CSS2.1 should reconsider the well known questions that have been raised against CSS2.0 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/1999Jul/0077.html). > * Section 17.4.1 says that percentage widths for top or bottom captions > are computed relative to the table box's containing block. What about > percentage heights? And side captions? The percent heights are still not described. > * Also in section 17.4.1, do auto side margins on side captions become > zero? Or is there some way to center both table and caption? This is still not answered and raises questions (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2002Dec/0133.html) > * Should section 17.5.3 say that length and percentage values of > vertical-align should also be equivalent to baseline, since they > do not apply to cells? I think it should but at CSS2.1 but it is not mentioned. > * The border collision rules (17.6.2) are ambiguous when borders differ > only in color and the conflicting borders are on adjacent cells, or > adjacent rows, etc. I think a rule such as: > > 5. the border on the element earlier in the document tree wins > > would be good. (I chose earlier because of table-header-groups and > table-footer-groups.) I think this is a good proposal. It would be good if David's comments could finally find a way into the spec. Bernd
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 12:47:13 UTC