- From: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:22:00 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
I formally propose the following changes: linefeed-treatment: [1] treat-as-space -> space treat-as-zero-width-space -> zero-width ignore-if-after-linefeed -> no-double white-space-treatment: -> white-space-discard: ignore -> all preserve -> none ignore-if-before-linefeed -> before-linefeed ignore-if-after-linefeed -> after-linefeed ignore-if-surrounding-linefeed -> around-linefeed all-space-treatment: -> white-space-collapse: So, the resulting properties are linefeed-treatment: auto | ignore | preserve | space | zero-width | no-double white-space-discard: all | none | before-linefeed | after-linefeed | around-linefeed white-space-collapse: preserve | collapse The names are shorter and more specific. In particular, the changes to white-space-treatment make the property's name more accurate and express its purpose more clearly. On another note, I also suggest dropping the 'no-double' option for linefeed-treatment. It sounds nice on paper, but I can't think of any practical reason to have it. Also, unlike the other values, it has a collapsing function, so it doesn't really fit in anyway. :) [1] Päper, Christoph. "Comments on CSS3: Text LC", www-style@w3.org (2002-02-25). message-id: <005701c27c43$e6a74490$3ef4ae8b@heim4.tuclausthal.de> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2002Oct/0092.html ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 08:21:16 UTC