- From: Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru>
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:38:07 +0400
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 12:28 am, C. Bottelier wrote: | At 11:33 AM 8/27/02, Vadim Plessky wrote: | >| | >| And we should author the documents in a pure presentation format like | >| PDF then. Why bother with markup if you don't care about the | >| structure? | > | >I think if we take again Word Processor (WP) paradigma, and add DTP | >(Desktop Publishing System), than we will recognize that DTP has better | >handling of document's structure than traditional WP. | | How about TeX, LaTeX, and LOUT documents? | I am not familiar with TeX, LaTeX, and haven't heard about LOUT at all. If you want *light* solution, which will be able to keep document structure, export PDF and provide WYSIWYG at the same moment - try KWord (http://www.koffice.org). KWord 1.2 (RC1 released 2 weeks ago, final release will follow in a week) has all this and even more :-) And BTW it can export XHTML1-Strict with CSS2 formatting (out from internal XML_based KWord format). | Christian. | | Microsoft products are susceptible to a large variety of viruses, worms, | and other fauna. This flaim is really not necessary here. I was speaking *document structure & presentation format * MS Word's .doc is widely used, and while I don't like it at all, leading Open-Source projects offer (at least) import functionality for Word documents. -- Vadim Plessky http://kde2.newmail.ru (English) 33 Window Decorations and 6 Widget Styles for KDE http://kde2.newmail.ru/kde_themes.html KDE mini-Themes http://kde2.newmail.ru/themes/
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2002 04:42:23 UTC