- From: <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:12:30 EDT
- To: www-tag@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4a.100e723b.2a8e624e@aol.com>
In a message dated 16/08/2002 14:21:57 GMT Daylight Time, howcome@opera.com writes: > > I do not think XSL-FO is any more or less semantic than HTML. > > Really? > > How do you express that some text is a headline in XSL-FO? Hakon, What is the "meaning" of a headline (sic)? Is there, for example, a worthwhile semantic difference between the following? <h1>"Formatting Objects Considered Harmful"</h1> <p>Often repeated</p> <p>Poorly argued</p> and <p>""Formatting Objects Considered Harmful"</p> <ul> <li>Often repeated</li> <li>Poorly argued</li> </ul> and <svg:text>"Formatting Objects Considered Harmful"</svg:text> <svg:tspan>Often repeated</svg:tspan> <svg:tspan>Poorly argued</svg:tspan> </svg:text> ? To a human reader the meaning is pretty clear but to pretend that the HTML variants shown (and there are many others) contain some sort of immutable semantics is, I suggest, illusory. Are you seriously suggesting that SVG too is "harmful" and should be abandoned because it lacks the historical domain-specific idiosyncracies of HTML? Andrew Watt
Received on Friday, 16 August 2002 10:13:05 UTC