- From: Kai Lahmann <kl@3dots.de>
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 04:34:30 +0200
- To: "Eric A. Meyer" <eric@meyerweb.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Eric A. Meyer wrote: > > At 18:13 +0200 8/14/02, Kai Lahmann wrote: > >> an (maybe silly?) Idea of a change of this. The image shouldn't be >> fixed related to the topleft corner of the viewport, but of the next >> parent element, which has any scrolling mechanism (thinking of >> overflow:scroll or a textarea). > > > I believe that there are already two interoperable implementations > of fixed-attachment background images as applied to arbitrary > elements, so it's too late to change the meaning of 'fixed'. You > could propose a new value that has the effect you desire. year - and many incompatible. Maybe a third value 'overflow', which results in this behavior? -- Kai Lahmann http://mywebpage.netscape.com/KaiL%20tuX/
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2002 22:33:13 UTC