- From: Jesse McCarthy <mccarthy36@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 14:09:36 -0400
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, 07 Apr 2002 17:06:28 +0100, Ian Hickson wrote: >History? Nobody is changing history. The CSS 2 [and any other such] Recommendation is essentially a historical document, as evidenced by the separate errata and established procedures for revision. >Nothing in CSS affects the semantics [1] of anything in any >document. CSS is >purely a formatting language. I know what semantics means. What I don't understand is why the Rec. says "The following 'display' values assign table semantics to an arbitrary element:" and you say that "Nothing in CSS affects the semantics of anything". Those two statements are diametrically opposed. For the record, the published CSS 2 Recommendation is the authoritative definition of this technology (to the extent that it is definitive; we are all only too aware of its many vagueries and shortcomings), not your opinion. What you say contradicts the Recommendation. So there are several possibilities: 1) The Rec. contains an error (says something that no one really meant). -- If this is the case then the error must be corrected/documented and the actual situation clearly exposed. 2) The Rec. does not contain an error, but defines a behavior that is now considered undesirable or a mistake in judgement. -- If this is the case it would seem to necessitate a revision or a new version of the Rec. to alter the undesirable behavior. 3) The Rec. contains neither an error nor a behavior which has subsequently been deemed undesirable. -- If this is the case, then your statements are just wrong. So what is the actual situation? On Sun, 07 Apr 2002 18:52:50 +0200, Jan Roland Eriksson wrote: >Stylesheets affects formatting and/or transformations of a marked up >documents content only, they can _not_ add semantics to markup. Unfortunately that is _not_ what the spec. _says_.
Received on Sunday, 7 April 2002 14:14:52 UTC