- From: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 16:53:04 +0200
- To: Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- CC: "Peter S. Linss" <peter@linss.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Tantek Celik wrote: >> All text/visual properties should apply to all languages and writing system. > > I strongly disagree. > > It is reasonable to expect that different languages and writing systems will > have different layout/typographic effects in common usage (yes, even before > the web). > > Therefore, it is far more useful to pursue properties even if they only > apply to a few languages, than to limit properties to some lowest common > denominator across hundreds of languages. > > 'word-spacing' may only apply to some languages, just as 'ruby' layout may > only apply to some languages. There are other examples of properties which > only make sense in a few languages (which happen to be non-Latin) in the > recent CSS3 Text Module. > > We should seek to represent the individual stylistic/typographical richness > of different languages and writing systems rather than attempting to force > them all to fit one mold. Are you saying that I should not be able to use a ruby box model with latin characters just because I like the effect it brings ? Or that I should not use grid layout because it is mainly made for ideographic writing systems ? Let's make features that everybody can use, as core feature of his own language/writing system, or as a nice rendering extension coming from other cultures. My .02 euros... </Daniel>
Received on Friday, 18 May 2001 10:53:16 UTC