- From: Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 15:40:01 -0700
- To: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
- CC: "Peter S. Linss" <peter@linss.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
From: glazman@netscape.com (Daniel Glazman) Subject: Re: first-word pseudo-element Date: Fri, May 18, 2001, 7:53 AM > Tantek Celik wrote: > >>> All text/visual properties should apply to all languages and writing system. >> >> I strongly disagree. >> >> It is reasonable to expect that different languages and writing systems will >> have different layout/typographic effects in common usage (yes, even before >> the web). >> >> Therefore, it is far more useful to pursue properties even if they only >> apply to a few languages, than to limit properties to some lowest common >> denominator across hundreds of languages. >> >> 'word-spacing' may only apply to some languages, just as 'ruby' layout may >> only apply to some languages. There are other examples of properties which >> only make sense in a few languages (which happen to be non-Latin) in the >> recent CSS3 Text Module. >> >> We should seek to represent the individual stylistic/typographical richness >> of different languages and writing systems rather than attempting to force >> them all to fit one mold. > > Are you saying that I should not be able to use a ruby box model with > latin characters just because I like the effect it brings ? Or that I > should not use grid layout because it is mainly made for ideographic > writing systems ? > > Let's make features that everybody can use, as core feature of his own > language/writing system, or as a nice rendering extension coming from > other cultures. > > My .02 euros... > > </Daniel> I agree that "features that everybody can use" are a good goal. The difference is that I don't see that as a requirement, and not only that, my point is that sometimes trying to make a feature "universal" as such may only end up dragging it down to the lowest common denominator among languages/writing systems. Much better to have multiple features if necessary, and preserve the fidelity of language specific stylistic mechanisms. Unicode provides examples of this kind of design goal. Tantek ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Have you validated your CSS today? http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Received on Friday, 18 May 2001 18:40:03 UTC