- From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 20:21:07 +0200 (MEST)
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@hotmail.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
Ian Hickson writes: > > (Bert - note the comments re: the errata at the bottom of this mail) > > On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: [...] > > [1] pre _and_ post current errata, since the errata didn't change > > section 4.1.3, see my try to discuss this and the report on 25th may > > this year on this list; btw.: appendix B must be changed, too; it's > > very obvious, that it wasn't intended to exclude the underscore... > > and yes, I'm somewhat disappointed that my report got ignored. > > Oops, thanks for pointing that out. Regarding whether it's a change or an > error, the distinction is simple: changes are informative, corrections to > known errors are normative. The Changes section is merely a placeholder > for proposals so that authors of new UAs know to be careful and not rely > on the relevant sections on the spec to stay the same, whereas the other > sections indicate that the WG is agreed that the change should take effect > immediately. > > Bert: Could you add to the errata item that the underscore change also > applies to section 4.1.3 and appendix B? Thanks! I added an errata for section 4.1.3, but what exactly should I write about appendix B? Bert -- Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ http://www.w3.org/people/bos/ W3C/INRIA bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Monday, 30 July 2001 14:21:11 UTC