- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 20:11:13 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- cc: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@hotmail.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >>> >>> I sympathize with the idea of an @version statement. I would be great >>> if I can specify "process this block only if you support all used >>> @rules/property-value pairs/selectors/etc." since implementing just >>> _some_ features of CSS may break documents, as shown above. >> >> But then should IE6 claim to support to support 'ex'? > > If it does, yes. It's not quite that black and white. IE6 does _something_ in response to seeing the 'ex' unit. It treats 1ex and being equivalent to 0.5em. That isn't a strictly correct interpretation of 1ex, though. >> How about 'float'? > > If it supports floats they way I used it, it should claim that it > supports it. Ah, so now we have to ask you for each browser release if a product should claim support for a particular feature or not? :-) -- Ian Hickson )\ _. - ._.) fL Invited Expert, CSS Working Group /. `- ' ( `--' The views expressed in this message are strictly `- , ) - > ) \ personal and not those of Netscape or Mozilla. ________ (.' \) (.' -' ______
Received on Sunday, 29 July 2001 23:10:35 UTC