- From: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 08:07:02 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
Bert Bos wrote: > > An erratum for 14.2 already exists. Is there a reason why it does not change this? <blockquote cite="http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-CSS2-19980512/colors.html#propdef-background-image"> If a background image is specified, this property specifies whether the image is repeated (tiled), and how. All tiling covers the content and padding areas of a box. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ </blockquote> > Why does it conflict with the figure in 17.5.1? That figure > talks about backgrounds only, not about borders. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/images/tbl-empty.gif <blockquote cite="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/tables.html#table-layers"> <STYLE type="text/css"> TABLE { background: #ff0; border-collapse: collapse } TD { background: red; border: double black } </STYLE> </blockquote> If the border were rendered on top of the elements background, the space between the double borders would be red, not yellow. This is also something that needs to be clarified: In the collapsing-borders table model, where are the boundaries of the cell backgrounds? Does one over-paint the other? Do they meet in the middle?
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2001 08:08:16 UTC