- From: Peter Foti (PeterF) <PeterF@SystolicNetworks.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:55:48 -0400
- To: "'Svgdeveloper@aol.com'" <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>
- Cc: "'www-style@w3.org'" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <A10A983C9DFBD4119F0300104B2EA6B7085DE6@ZIPPY>
I may be wrong, but I think that this *should* be handled using existing CSS properties padding (and margin?), in which case you would apply the style to the td's of your table. No change would be required for CSS3. Of course, that doesn't mean that any UA's support this yet (haven't tried it), but I believe this would be the true CSS method for formatting the spacing between cells. -Peter Foti -----Original Message----- From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Svgdeveloper@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 3:13 PM To: www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: Cellspacing in CSS1 or CSS2 In a message dated 17/07/01 20:02:37 GMT Daylight Time, mjohnson@marcdavidjohnson.com writes: Saw this message (and another about cellspacing / centering / etc.) and thought I'd whip up a VERY quick page. http://www.marcdavidjohnson.com/centest.htm This page uses 4 images, text, etc. and NO TABLES (tables should be reserved for laying out data, not for laying out a page). CSS has the ability to 'kiss' (push elements together) images, divs, etc. as you can see by the source of the page. Now, if anyone has any questions about the code or needs the example expanded in scope, let me know. Hi Marc, Thanks for the reply. However my question was about cellspacing in tables. The use which lay behind the question was, as it happens, for laying out data in a table. I take it from your reply that neither CSS1 nor CSS2 can cope with this. I see no reason why a table influenced by CSS rules should fail to implement the control which the corresponding HTML attributes provides. It should be possible to display data in tables in a manner which the designer wishes. Tony Haddon's post would seem to confirm that this functionality has indeed been omitted. But it would be nice to have an answer from someone on the W3C CSS WG about the background to this seeming omission. If you, Marc, are on the WG please forgive my not being aware of that. Andrew Watt
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2001 15:50:20 UTC