- From: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:55:34 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
| What? You gave me the same link as I gave you! Pardon. m(_)m I guess I wasn't paying close enough attention. But you did say that it *wasn't* implementable in XHTML; you didn't say that there was a subideal implementation and you wanted an improvement. | I still believe it is a style rather than a structural | concern; then you can use @media aural Are you sure you're not confusing style with content? The XHTML document takes care of content as well as structure. | Possibly an alternative quicker table of contents, for example, instead of:- | [home] [section 1] [section 2] ... [mail us] | You could point it to a file containing:- | [home] [mail us] | My examples are always crud, so I urge you to think of a better one if you | see what I am talking about ;-) I think I see what you're doing. There's two possibilities here, though: 1. you delete some links 2. you change the links For 1--as you proposed, allow-skip: true; is fine. You don't really need "alternate content" for that. (I think 'play' is redundant with 'display' and 'allow-skip') To configure the prompt, maybe you could use allow-skip: true; prompt-skip: [string]; where the UA could say something like "Skip [string]?" And just to make things easy, you could have a shorthand: skip: true [string]; If you want to hide that section entirely, you put display: none; For 2, well, it does /not/ belong in CSS. You're changing the content, plain and simple. It has nothing to do with the style in which it is presented. | Yes, but what about an alt for ASCII art of something? They can't have alt | properties... Then propose something to the HTML WG. That sort of thing is the domain of the markup language. Anyway, how is the browser to know whether it's processing ASCII art as opposed to text unless you /mark/ it as such?
Received on Monday, 16 October 2000 15:55:07 UTC