- From: Sean Palmer <wapdesign@wapdesign.org.uk>
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 20:04:14 +0100
- To: "Robin Berjon" <robin@knowscape.com>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
> One example I can think of that could be useful is if UA X supports both
> properties A and B, but UA Y only supports property B. One might want to
> have UAs that support property A to use it and those that don't to use
> property B, but not for those that support both to use both. In that case
> selector { propA: value, else(propB: value); } could be useful. I can't
> seem to track it down now but I remember there was talk about allowing
> extensions to css syntax with properties prefixed with a -. Having the
> ability to fallback would be useful in such cases.
That is a good generic way of putting it. Could I paraphrase that in future
verisons?
Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
WAP Tech Info - http://www.waptechinfo.com/
Received on Sunday, 15 October 2000 15:09:15 UTC