Re: Default XSL stylesheet for XHTML documents

* "Ian Hickson" <ianh@netscape.com> wrote:
| > Conversion to PDF for printing and document exchange when XHTML+CSS
| > isn't appropriate.
|
| XHTML+XSLT+XSL:FO can do no more than XHTML+XSLT+CSS.

So development of XSL is waste of time? XML documents can be transformed to
XHTML documents and styled with CSS equally so noone needs XSL? Why didn't
anyone notice that and stopped XSL development?

| What's more, XSL has not even reached version 1.0 yet. CSS is currently in
| the development of it's third revision.

You do not want to tell me, the higher the version number is, the better the
technologie.

regards,
--
Björn Höhrmann ^ mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de ^ http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 ° Telefon: +49(0)4667/981ASK ° http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll # PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 # http://learn.to/quote +{i}
--- Only connect! That was the whole of the sermon. -- E. M. Forster ---

Received on Sunday, 1 October 2000 15:55:50 UTC