- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 02:48:37 +0200
- To: Bruno <bruno@teraram.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Bruno wrote: > > Hello > > I have little question for someone who is responsible for 'azimuth' > property. I was reading it, and I just could not find explanation what does > 'behind' mean. Its a modifier keyword rather than a keyword that is used by itself, and it means the exact opposite of 'in front', which is the default meaningwhen 'behind' is not specified. More precisely, it is a modifier which produces a reflection on the 90-270 degree axis. So for example azimuth: center-right means 20 degrees, where zero degrees is straight ahead (the way your nose points) and 90 degrees is the way your right ear points. But azimuth: center-right behind means 160 degrees. Its just as far to the right as center-right is, but its behind you. > So if someone can explain it to me I would appreciate it. I hope that helped. I notice that two CSS books that explain this use a diagram, which would have helped (the books are in French and in Japanese respectively, which may be relevant because presumably the english-language keywords were less suggestive of meaning, requiring more explanation). Now if I could have sent the explanation as a diagram in SVG it would have been a lot easier ;-) Oh one more thing, notice the conformance requirement that if an implementation is unable to produce sounds behind the listener it can produce them by converting places in the rearwards hemisphere to the corresponding positions in the forwards hemisphere. For azimuths given as degrees, there is a formula: if 90deg < x <= 180deg then x := 180deg - x if 180deg < x <= 270deg then x := 540deg - x For azimuths given using keywords, you can convert to numbers and apply the formula. Or you can just drop the 'behind' modifier, which gives the same result. > P.S. for CSS developers - is there any reward for something like this :-) Fame, if you produce the first fully-conforming implementation - and adulation, if its open-source as well ;-) -- Chris
Received on Wednesday, 19 July 2000 20:48:43 UTC