- From: Karlsson Kent - keka <keka@im.se>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:14:15 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Cc: "'www-font@w3.org'" <www-font@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: erik@netscape.com [mailto:erik@netscape.com] ... > Karlsson Kent - keka wrote: > > > > So Erik, please revive your proposal (and, originally, my) to define > > an em the same way in CSS as it is in TeX (which does pick > it up from > > not only historical but also modern typography). > > The proposal was definitely originally yours. I supported it for a > while, but I got tired swimming against the current. The current may have been strong, but amongst it I haven't found *any* good reason for diverging from the other, still very highly viable, digital typesetting system (for authors that typeset their own documents). Kind regards /kent k
Received on Monday, 31 January 2000 13:14:43 UTC