- From: Karlsson Kent - keka <keka@im.se>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:07:44 +0100
- To: "'David Perrell'" <davidp@earthlink.net>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 21 January 2000 06:07:41 UTC
> "Several TeX command use dimensions as their parameters to > specify sizes for > different items. There are a number of units that can be used > for those > dimensions: ... > em - horizontal size of the point size of the font ..." The quote continues: "about the [horizontal] size of the letter "M" in the current font." which apparently wasn't to your liking. And still, as I said, the typography books I've consulted (publiched in the 1990ies), also refer to "em" as the width of an "M". The "(nominal) square" (or however one should translate the term "fyrkant", is bigger than an em, so calling it an "em square" is a misnomer. Though quite expectable given the flora of different definitions of "em". Kind regards /kent k
Received on Friday, 21 January 2000 06:07:41 UTC