- From: Douglas Bagnall <douglas@paradise.net.nz>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:29:33 +1300
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
When I worked as a hand-typographer (somewhat anachronistically in the mid-1980s), em-blocks were square, and it was obvious why. A square can fit into a line of type, whatever its orientation. A slightly off-square block would require close, eye-straining, examination before it could be correctly fitted into the line. The actual width of an M is neither here nor there. douglas
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2000 17:29:19 UTC