- From: Matthew Brealey <thelawnet@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 04:44:09 -0800 (PST)
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
1. <blockquote> This specification does not define how alphabetic systems wrap at the end of the alphabet. For instance, after 26 list items, 'lower-latin' rendering is undefined. Therefore, for long lists, we recommend that authors specify true numbers. </blockquote> aa ab ac ad ae ... zz ... aaa aab aac aad (just look at a spreadsheet) What makes this limitation all the more mystifying is that negative values _are_ permitted on counter-increment and counter-reset, where a real problem does exist (e.g., content: counter(function, lower-alpha); counter-reset: -1). Therefore, I would suggest that the following sentence should be included: 'Where it is possible that a value for a counter function will result in an unrenderable value in the specified list style type, decimal should be used instead. E.g.,: LI {counter(function, lower-alpha); counter-increment: -1)} OL {counter-reset: 26} results in: 26 25 24 As a result, I would propose that the restriction that increments and resets must be integer values should be removed. In addition, could somebody explain what the counters() function is meant to do, because I haven't got a clue - no examples are given and the text in the spec has got me stumped. ===== ---------------------------------------------------------- From Matthew Brealey (http://members.tripod.co.uk/lawnet (for law)or http://members.tripod.co.uk/lawnet/WEBFRAME.HTM (for CSS)) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
Received on Monday, 17 January 2000 07:44:11 UTC