- From: Matthew Brealey <thelawnet@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 04:27:55 -0800 (PST)
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
--- Bert Bos <Bert.Bos@sophia.inria.fr> wrote: > Matthew Brealey writes: > > auto > > The UA determines the cursor to display based on the > > current context. > > > > This seems to say that the UA can use whatever cursor > > it likes, when it likes. > > Sort of, yes. Incidentally, cursor: auto is superfluous (i.e., because of browser style sheets - e.g., P INPUT[text]). > > > > > However, it is my belief that the whole of an element > > must be subject to a given style at once, and > > therefore that browsers (i.e., all of them) that only > > associate cursor: pointer [why wasn't it cursor: > > link?] with link text, rather than with its box, are > > buggy. Although this is my belief, the CSS spec both > > are silent on the matter, so clarification of the > > correct approach would be appreciated. > > Well, we can't specify every last detail. If we would do that, either > the spec would be 2000 pages and completely unreadable, or we would > write the "spec" in C and be done with it. > > There are lots of places where we leave things to the common sense of > the implementer or where we leave things unspecified because we don't > know (yet) what the best way is. In this case also I would like to see > implementers try out what the best way is. If user studies reveal that > certain styles of cursors are better than others we may recommend > those in the next spec. Associations I would suggest: text, help, pointer, grab - with inline content all other cursors - with the box Incidentally, the reason for the question was that I found it rather annoying in a scripting content that cursors are only associated with the hight of the rendered glyph rather than the theoretical height specified by the font-size. ===== ---------------------------------------------------------- From Matthew Brealey (http://members.tripod.co.uk/lawnet (for law)or http://members.tripod.co.uk/lawnet/WEBFRAME.HTM (for CSS)) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
Received on Friday, 14 January 2000 07:27:57 UTC