- From: Matthew Brealey <thelawnet@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:12:03 -0800 (PST)
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
--- Ian Hickson <py8ieh@bath.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Matthew Brealey wrote:
>
> > 2. Non-replaced elements contain content that is used directly (not
> > replaced). <br> therefore is not non-replaced.
>
> Not true. <span></span> is not replaced,
Indeed not because its content ('') is used directly.
The important thing about a non-replaced element is that any non-replaced
element will be the same for given properties.
Thus <span></span> will always be the same given SPAN {properties},
whereas BR will not - its dimensions depend on the amount of content
before and after it, etc.
> <empty/> is not replaced
> either.
<empty/> is meaningless.
> <br/> (<br> in HTML) is just an empty, non-replaced, inline
> element. There is nothing in the spec saying that inline elements must
> contain content.
There is no way that <br> is a non-replaced elements - non-replaced
elements do not have width: x some of the time and width: y at others.
It is not possible to interpret <br> as non-replaced, inline or anything
else - it is a forced line break, nothing more, nothing less.
> However, the entire issue is moot given the anonymous inline concept I
> mentioned previously.
Don't you mean proposal or change? - no use for CSS-2 browsers.
=====
----------------------------------------------------------
From Matthew Brealey (http://members.tripod.co.uk/lawnet (for law)or http://members.tripod.co.uk/lawnet/WEBFRAME.HTM (for CSS))
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2000 13:45:07 UTC