- From: Matthew Brealey <thelawnet@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:12:03 -0800 (PST)
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
--- Ian Hickson <py8ieh@bath.ac.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Matthew Brealey wrote: > > > 2. Non-replaced elements contain content that is used directly (not > > replaced). <br> therefore is not non-replaced. > > Not true. <span></span> is not replaced, Indeed not because its content ('') is used directly. The important thing about a non-replaced element is that any non-replaced element will be the same for given properties. Thus <span></span> will always be the same given SPAN {properties}, whereas BR will not - its dimensions depend on the amount of content before and after it, etc. > <empty/> is not replaced > either. <empty/> is meaningless. > <br/> (<br> in HTML) is just an empty, non-replaced, inline > element. There is nothing in the spec saying that inline elements must > contain content. There is no way that <br> is a non-replaced elements - non-replaced elements do not have width: x some of the time and width: y at others. It is not possible to interpret <br> as non-replaced, inline or anything else - it is a forced line break, nothing more, nothing less. > However, the entire issue is moot given the anonymous inline concept I > mentioned previously. Don't you mean proposal or change? - no use for CSS-2 browsers. ===== ---------------------------------------------------------- From Matthew Brealey (http://members.tripod.co.uk/lawnet (for law)or http://members.tripod.co.uk/lawnet/WEBFRAME.HTM (for CSS)) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2000 13:45:07 UTC