- From: Matthew Brealey <webmaster@richinstyle.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 16:59:31 +0100
- To: Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Tantek Celik wrote: > > > Yes, all the other pseudo-elements are state-independent so what does > > that prove? > > Interesting point, but merely a coincidence. > > It doesn't change the fact that it is fairly well accepted in the CSS > community that: > > - a pseudo-class applies to a whole element, and indicates a state change > of that entire element. it always represents a node in the source tree. > > - a pseudo-element potentially applies to only part of an element or > elements. it typically does _not_ represent a node in the source tree. Is it? Oh ok. > BTW - I am getting auto-responder email from webmaster@richinstyle.com about > "contact re broken links etc." - did you intend to change the "reply-to" > address on the email you send out? Or is the auto-responder getting > confused? Very strange. Ozstar.com has nothing to do with me. But I'm sure I've seen it before. Perhaps someone else has some idea. ----------------------------------- Please visit http://RichInStyle.com. Featuring: MySite: customizable styles. AlwaysWork style Browser bug table covering all CSS2 with links to descriptions. Lists of > 1000 browser bugs Websafe Colorizer CSS2, CSS1 and HTML4 tutorials. CSS masterclass CSS2 test suite: 5000++ tests and 300+ test pages.
Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2000 11:53:12 UTC