- From: Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 04:51:05 -0700
- To: webmaster@richinstyle.com
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
From: Matthew Brealey <webmaster@richinstyle.com> Date: Wed, Aug 16, 2000, 6:41 AM > Yes, all the other pseudo-elements are state-independent so what does > that prove? Interesting point, but merely a coincidence. It doesn't change the fact that it is fairly well accepted in the CSS community that: - a pseudo-class applies to a whole element, and indicates a state change of that entire element. it always represents a node in the source tree. - a pseudo-element potentially applies to only part of an element or elements. it typically does _not_ represent a node in the source tree. BTW - I am getting auto-responder email from webmaster@richinstyle.com about "contact re broken links etc." - did you intend to change the "reply-to" address on the email you send out? Or is the auto-responder getting confused? Tantek ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- You're going deeper into your cave. www.microsoft.com/mac/ie/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > From: webmaster.autoresponder@richinstyle.com > Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 08:41:09 -0500 > To: tantek@CS.Stanford.EDU > Subject: webmaster > > Thank you for contacting the Webmaster. > Should this be about broken links or any > problems with the sites please try and > recall which of the to/from links didn't > work as there are too many for us to try manually. > > Sometimes they do not work at the time for reasons > other than incorrect addressing. We are sorry if you > were inconvenienced anyway ! > > Your inquiry has been placed into the > system and you will be contacted within > 48 hours. Should you not here back > please email us again as it may have > got lost in the busy system. > > > Thank you again. > > webmaster@ozstar.com > http://www.ozstar.com > The OZSTAR GATEWAY
Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2000 09:52:53 UTC